Friday, October 7, 2011

Prometheus Bound (The State of Science and Technology in the Philippines)

a 4-part documentary that shows the terrible condition of the country's scientists, engineers and educators. This documentary also shows the backwardness of the Philippine economy.

part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iv1ZZWU5efkhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?
part 2

part 3

part 4

Steve Jobs Commencement Address at Stanford University

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june15/jobs-061505.html

This is a prepared text of the Commencement address delivered by Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer and of Pixar Animation Studios, on June 12, 2005.



I am honored to be with you today at your commencement from one of the finest universities in the world. I never graduated from college. Truth be told, this is the closest I've ever gotten to a college graduation. Today I want to tell you three stories from my life. That's it. No big deal. Just three stories.
The first story is about connecting the dots.
I dropped out of Reed College after the first 6 months, but then stayed around as a drop-in for another 18 months or so before I really quit. So why did I drop out?
It started before I was born. My biological mother was a young, unwed college graduate student, and she decided to put me up for adoption. She felt very strongly that I should be adopted by college graduates, so everything was all set for me to be adopted at birth by a lawyer and his wife. Except that when I popped out they decided at the last minute that they really wanted a girl. So my parents, who were on a waiting list, got a call in the middle of the night asking: "We have an unexpected baby boy; do you want him?" They said: "Of course." My biological mother later found out that my mother had never graduated from college and that my father had never graduated from high school. She refused to sign the final adoption papers. She only relented a few months later when my parents promised that I would someday go to college.
And 17 years later I did go to college. But I naively chose a college that was almost as expensive as Stanford, and all of my working-class parents' savings were being spent on my college tuition. After six months, I couldn't see the value in it. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life and no idea how college was going to help me figure it out. And here I was spending all of the money my parents had saved their entire life. So I decided to drop out and trust that it would all work out OK. It was pretty scary at the time, but looking back it was one of the best decisions I ever made. The minute I dropped out I could stop taking the required classes that didn't interest me, and begin dropping in on the ones that looked interesting.
It wasn't all romantic. I didn't have a dorm room, so I slept on the floor in friends' rooms, I returned coke bottles for the 5¢ deposits to buy food with, and I would walk the 7 miles across town every Sunday night to get one good meal a week at the Hare Krishna temple. I loved it. And much of what I stumbled into by following my curiosity and intuition turned out to be priceless later on. Let me give you one example:
Reed College at that time offered perhaps the best calligraphy instruction in the country. Throughout the campus every poster, every label on every drawer, was beautifully hand calligraphed. Because I had dropped out and didn't have to take the normal classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do this. I learned about serif and san serif typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter combinations, about what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can't capture, and I found it fascinating.
None of this had even a hope of any practical application in my life. But ten years later, when we were designing the first Macintosh computer, it all came back to me. And we designed it all into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography. If I had never dropped in on that single course in college, the Mac would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced fonts. And since Windows just copied the Mac, it's likely that no personal computer would have them. If I had never dropped out, I would have never dropped in on this calligraphy class, and personal computers might not have the wonderful typography that they do. Of course it was impossible to connect the dots looking forward when I was in college. But it was very, very clear looking backwards ten years later.
Again, you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something — your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.
My second story is about love and loss.
I was lucky — I found what I loved to do early in life. Woz and I started Apple in my parents garage when I was 20. We worked hard, and in 10 years Apple had grown from just the two of us in a garage into a $2 billion company with over 4000 employees. We had just released our finest creation — the Macintosh — a year earlier, and I had just turned 30. And then I got fired. How can you get fired from a company you started? Well, as Apple grew we hired someone who I thought was very talented to run the company with me, and for the first year or so things went well. But then our visions of the future began to diverge and eventually we had a falling out. When we did, our Board of Directors sided with him. So at 30 I was out. And very publicly out. What had been the focus of my entire adult life was gone, and it was devastating.
I really didn't know what to do for a few months. I felt that I had let the previous generation of entrepreneurs down - that I had dropped the baton as it was being passed to me. I met with David Packard and Bob Noyce and tried to apologize for screwing up so badly. I was a very public failure, and I even thought about running away from the valley. But something slowly began to dawn on me — I still loved what I did. The turn of events at Apple had not changed that one bit. I had been rejected, but I was still in love. And so I decided to start over.
I didn't see it then, but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again, less sure about everything. It freed me to enter one of the most creative periods of my life.
During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the worlds first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple's current renaissance. And Laurene and I have a wonderful family together.
I'm pretty sure none of this would have happened if I hadn't been fired from Apple. It was awful tasting medicine, but I guess the patient needed it. Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don't lose faith. I'm convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You've got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle. As with all matters of the heart, you'll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking until you find it. Don't settle.
My third story is about death.
When I was 17, I read a quote that went something like: "If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you'll most certainly be right." It made an impression on me, and since then, for the past 33 years, I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself: "If today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?" And whenever the answer has been "No" for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something.
Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure - these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.
About a year ago I was diagnosed with cancer. I had a scan at 7:30 in the morning, and it clearly showed a tumor on my pancreas. I didn't even know what a pancreas was. The doctors told me this was almost certainly a type of cancer that is incurable, and that I should expect to live no longer than three to six months. My doctor advised me to go home and get my affairs in order, which is doctor's code for prepare to die. It means to try to tell your kids everything you thought you'd have the next 10 years to tell them in just a few months. It means to make sure everything is buttoned up so that it will be as easy as possible for your family. It means to say your goodbyes.
I lived with that diagnosis all day. Later that evening I had a biopsy, where they stuck an endoscope down my throat, through my stomach and into my intestines, put a needle into my pancreas and got a few cells from the tumor. I was sedated, but my wife, who was there, told me that when they viewed the cells under a microscope the doctors started crying because it turned out to be a very rare form of pancreatic cancer that is curable with surgery. I had the surgery and I'm fine now.
This was the closest I've been to facing death, and I hope it's the closest I get for a few more decades. Having lived through it, I can now say this to you with a bit more certainty than when death was a useful but purely intellectual concept:
No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don't want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life's change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.
Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.
When I was young, there was an amazing publication called The Whole Earth Catalog, which was one of the bibles of my generation. It was created by a fellow named Stewart Brand not far from here in Menlo Park, and he brought it to life with his poetic touch. This was in the late 1960's, before personal computers and desktop publishing, so it was all made with typewriters, scissors, and polaroid cameras. It was sort of like Google in paperback form, 35 years before Google came along: it was idealistic, and overflowing with neat tools and great notions.
Stewart and his team put out several issues of The Whole Earth Catalog, and then when it had run its course, they put out a final issue. It was the mid-1970s, and I was your age. On the back cover of their final issue was a photograph of an early morning country road, the kind you might find yourself hitchhiking on if you were so adventurous. Beneath it were the words: "Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish." It was their farewell message as they signed off. Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish. And I have always wished that for myself. And now, as you graduate to begin anew, I wish that for you.
Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.
Thank you all very much.

*Hope this inspires you all.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Hi, everyone! I'll just ask kung mayroon kayong pwedeng macontact from the University of the East para lang madagdagan yung sources ko. Thanks!

Sunday, September 11, 2011

assigned topics for term paper

For everyone's benefit, please see below the list of topics taken by your classmates already.


Name
Term Paper Topics
Abdullah, Faysaleyyah
Pangandaman
Baluca, Jan Erish
Henry Sy and SM
Bitonio, Marion Denise

Chua, Ma. Christine Camille
PAL
Clavecilla, Daryl John
Eusebio Family of Pasig
Dee, Francis Joseph
Manny Pangilinan or Lopez
Dolor, Lourdes Xylene

Escanilla, Emmalyn
Crisologos
Fabula, Jane Blessilda
Cardinal Sin
Funa, Patrick

Garcia, Jacel Jam
Asistio and Echiverri of Caloocan
Lagonoy, Ma. Angeli

Lopez, Clara Maria Francesca
Romy Tan of Legazpi City
Marin, Jon Vincent
To confirm topic
Mendoza, Evanjames
Durano or Gaisano of Cebu
Mendoza, Justin Zosimo
Gordons of Olongapo
Pagsuyoin, Joanna Marie
Manila Bulletin
Palisoc, Niña Kristina R.
Globe
Ramirez, Mary Roseanne
Neptali Gonzalez
Rollorata, Renz Paula
Arsenio Lacson Sr. mayor of Manila
Umeda, En Javiña
Vilma Santos

Friday, September 9, 2011

Assignment to be submitted on Wednesday

Please make an analysis and or reflection on the latest Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 issued by the World Economic Forum (with the Philippines rising 10 spots from 85th place last year to 75th this year) . Please type it for easier reading. Deadline is on Wednesday (September  14, 2011).

For those who do not have their term paper topic yet, better consult asap. The deadline for submitting your term paper will be on September 30, 2011 Friday.

Thanks!

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Classes on Friday August 19, 2011

For the benefit of everyone, yes we'll have a class on Friday, August 19, 2011, same time, same place. :)

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Topics for Term Paper


·        Arsenio H. Lacson, Mayor of Manila
·       Rafael Lacson, Governor of Negros Occidental (1949-1953)
·       Clash of warlords
o   Mindoro
o   Masbate
o   Abra
·        “Biography” of corporations
o   Philippine Airlines
o   SM = Shoe Mart
o   University of the East
o   Smart
o   Globe
·        The old elite
o   Madrigal
o   Ayala
o   Aboitiz
o   Elizalde
·        History of the sugar bloc
·        History of the tobacco bloc
·        History of the coconut bloc
·        The media lords:
o   Lopez family
o   Duavit-Gozon
o   Emilio Yap
o   Manuel Pangilinan
o   Marixi Prieto
o   Eugenia Apostol 

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Topics and consultation for Term paper

For more convenience and faster dissemination of information, let us use this blog for proposing topics for your term paper. Indicate your name and the topic you are proposing. Also whenever you want to consult, please post here your preferred time and date of consultation. This will help you and your classmates to see who are consulting on what date, to avoid time conflict as well as be aware of the topics that your classmates already got to avoid proposing the same topic.

The following are to consult tomorrow (August 4, 2011) (with Dr. Nemenzo's approval)
1. Mendoza, Justin- 2PM
2. Garcia, Jacel- 3-3:30PM
3. Ramirez, Roseanne- 2:30PM

To those who are planning to consult on Friday, (August 5, 2011) sir is okay for consultation before class.

For the rest, please indicate your preferred schedule for consulting by posting a comment in this post so it will be easier to track. Thanks!

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Classes suspended today (July 27, 2011)

Malacanang already announced suspension of classes today due to typhoon. We'll meet on Friday. Please be guided accordingly. Thanks!

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Attention Everyone

Please watch the State of the Nation Address of Pres. Noynoy Aquino on TV today. Thanks!

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Oligarchic control of the state By Tony Lopez

Manila Times
July 19, 2011

Oligarchic control of the state
By Tony Lopez

THREE weeks ago, upon the invitation of economist Bernie Villegas, I attended a seminar on structural reform at the University of Asia and the Pacific.

The consensus after four hours of discussion is that there is need to amend the Constitution to open up the economy and allow a greater inflow of foreign investments to push the country’s economic development.

The view of the participants is that there are just too many areas closed to foreigners. The restrictions were imposed in the 1935 Constitution and which were carried forward into the 1973 and 1987 Constitution.

As a result of these restrictions, the economy has remained in the stranglehold of the country’s entrenched oligarchies and power brokers. There are no more than 100 families controlling the politics and business of this country.

Five of the six largest commercial banks are all privately owned, by oligarchs. The six banks control more than 70 percent. The five largest private banks are: No. 1 BDO owned by retailing and property magnate Henry Sy Sr. (the richest Filipino); No. 2 Metrobank owned by auto and property tycoon George SK Ty; No. 3 Bank of PI owned by the banking, telco and real estate conglomerate Ayala Corp. chaired by Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala; No. 5 RCBC of industrialist-philanthropist Al Yuchengco; and PNB of tobacco and property mogul Lucio Tan (the second richest Filipino).

These bank owners are among the 15 richest individuals in the country. Sadly, they are not exactly among the 15 largest individual taxpayers.

Two-bit actors and radio-tv personalities pay more taxes than they do.

With just P331.5 billion of equity, the five largest private banks control P3.29 trillion or 51 percent of total banking industry resources, P2.5 trillion or 53 percent of total system deposits, and P1.52 trillion or 58 percent of total commercial banking loans. The owners of these banks multiplied every peso ten times in terms of banking resources, 7.5 times in terms of deposits and 4.5 times in terms of loans.

If you are or have been a small businessman you will know just how difficult to obtain loans from these banks. The practice reminds you of Shylock.

“We’re still an oligarchy run by a few families,” says Senator Manny Villar, the first Filipino brown billionaire. “They (the oligarchs) are happy with the present setup now and they will not allow the Constitution to be tampered with.”

“The media, from what I’ve seen, is also controlled by groups that do not want to change the Constitution,” the former Senate president adds. “And that is why any proposal (to amend the Constitution) will be killed right away.”

Villar notes the difficulties encountered by small entrepreneurs in growing their business.
“We always look at foreign investments but we don’t look at the local, the small entrepreneurs, who are unable to borrow, unable to access credit because our banking system is controlled by five or six families and they are happy investing in ROPs (government debt papers) or lending to big industries,” the senator relates. “Right now that is our banking system—it’s a cartel and it’s getting fewer and bigger through consolidation.”

Reform is needed in a nation of 95 million (the 12th largest population in the world), a country where one of every four families is certifiably poor, where 70 percent of the wealth is owned by only the top two percent of the population, where both unemployment and underemployment are massive and beyond mitigation, where economic growth in the 25 years before 2005 was the slowest in the world (bar none), where both the Muslim separatist and communist insurgencies are the longest running in the world, and where taxpayers (including the richest people and largest corporations of the land) are congenitally disposed to evade or not pay taxes.

In his paper at the Center for Research and Communication seminar on structural change July 1 at the University of Asia and the Pacific, former National Security Adviser Jose T. Almonte enumerated some of the reforms.

Almonte suggests increasing the pay of government workers. Their pay is 60 percent below market rates, he notes. “This practically encourages officials holding great discretionary powers but take home so little pay to sell favors to their clients,” he points.

“We must raise the standards of openness in all public transactions. And we need to put more teeth in our Ombudsman institution. Right now, corruption is a ‘high-reward, low-risk’ offense,” Almonte urges.

“Far too many branches of our police and justice system are inefficient or even corrupt. Access to the courts is difficult and costly, and decisions are sometimes arbitrary,” he noted.

Also the ‘no-reelection’ clause (for a sitting president)—together with the procedural difficulties of impeachment—in effect places the President beyond the reach of the popular judgment. “I would prefer a President with two four-year terms,” Almonte winces.

He suggests a truly autonomous Commission on Elections —“by vesting it with its own status and resources, enabling it to computerize its facilities, and empowering it to regulate party finances and access to the media.”

Almonte insists on “developing a stable two-party system. At last count, we had 162 separate parties registered with the COMELEC—but with none large enough and coherent enough to make public policy.”

He thinks “switching to the parliamentary system might in fact help institutionalize our parties, and make the centralization of political power easier to organize, it will also rid us of the protectionist provisions that prevent the entry of foreign capital into key sectors of our economy.”

On another front, Almonte says “if we are to begin redressing the balance of our lopsided economy, we must make countryside development a centerpiece of public policy. And the bulk of our spending in human capital, we must shift to our most disadvantaged regions in a kind of affirmative action.”
Finally, Almonte complains, “the very center of the State itself has been captured by the national oligarchy.”

“Interest groups have such effective control of the State machinery that rule making and enforcement serve not the general welfare but particular interests,” he says.

“Oligarchic influence on the highest State organs enables powerful individuals, families, and clans to tilt the rules of competition in their favor —and acquire privileged access to the rents and commissions generated by public investments.”

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

In the Defense of Elitism

Elitism has been viewed in two differing lights as either "inevitable and desirable" or "remediable and regrettable" (Heywood, 2007, 83). For advocates of modern democratic rule, the latter contention is particularly resonant. After all, democracy was founded on the idea that all are born equal with natural rights and thus should be free from the arbitrary rule of the few.

However, these same theorists (Hobbes and Locke) also prescribe that we surrender some of these rights to a sovereign to escape the state of nature. Whether by necessity or by convenience, these same scholars acknowledge that a smaller group should exercise power in a society, as expounded upon by scholars such as Michels and Mosca. This smaller group, as C. W. Mills puts it, form the power elite that shapes the trajectory of a nation's policies. While modern democrats advocate checks on this power elite through representative government and separation of powers as advocated by Locke, the fact remains that in modern democracies, as in the autocracies that democracy was pioneered to replace, power is still exercised by a small group.

There are few escapes from the "iron law of oligarchy" as Michels puts it. One would be direct democracy closer to what was envisioned by the Athenians who pioneered classical democracy wherein all citizens would participate in governing, commonly done through plebiscites and referendums in modern times. However, this means of governing has drawbacks in terms of practicability (What mechanism can be used to allow all citizens of a state to participatey?) and convenience (Would people participate in governing if this took time away from their labor or leisure?).

The other escape would be anarchy, or the absence of the state, which brings us back to the state of nature and whether existence in a society is possible without government or would life be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Interestingly, Marx believed that through the "withering away of the state" people would be able to live harmoniously in the absence of the state, albeit through the heavy hand of the state during the period of the "dictatorship of the proletariat." Still, no socialist state has reached the communist mode of production leading many to rethink Marx's "withering away of the state."

For the most part, it would seem that the rule of the few has more or less been accepted in mainstream political discourse. If the formation of political elites is unavoidable, then what separates democracies from autocracies is not whether the few or the many rule, but the ability of the people to constrain the power of the ruler, often manifested in electoral rules mandated by a constitution. This would be what prevents the formation of Aristotle's "perverted" government (rule for the ruler) and foster "natural" government (rule for all).

Thus, elitism per se should probably not be antagonized as only unchecked elite rule is detrimental to society. In our case, elites for the most part have proven to be non-cohesive with a large number of them implementing unpredictable policies, exercising unchecked power, and possessing unclear motives...

Oh well...

Reference

Heywood, A. (2007). Politics (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan